QOtW9: Hey! I'm a Journalist too!

The birth of a new era of citizen journalism was clear after the September 11 attack. Vast amounts of emails were circulated at that time regarding the situation telling others of their observations. Some others found it an opportune moment to blog about the incident. It would be a breath of fresh air, being able to attain information from a source other than news channels. Radically different perspectives from the minds of many as compared to a team of reporters in a particular news TV station could sometimes mean a clearer depiction of an actual incident.

Citizen journalism is commonly known as “participatory journalism.” It involves the act of ordinary citizens with no journalistic credentials, to participate in the role of a journalist, collecting, reporting, analyzing, writing and disseminating information. (Wiki, 2006) It is a unique form of media for citizens which allow heavy user generated content.

With the freedom and reduced amount of restrictions in cyberspace, people are liberated to write about current affairs, societal issues, and almost everything under the sun that was once constricted due to the traditional forms of media. Not everyone has the means to having their ideas, opinions, observations and information, broadcasted over a TV network or published in a newspaper. News is what people make of it, especially in more ways than one. For people who want to be informed, the Internet is the answer. Where else can you find information from so many sources? And, there are those who wish so passionately to be part of the whole process, where then, do these aspiring citizen journalists turn to? (Gilmore, 2004)

The Web is merely a start……………………

STOMP (Straits Times Online Mobile Print), is an online platform that encourages Singaporeans to connect with the world and embrace citizen journalism. It allows for “uncertified” journalists to contribute. STOMP has a chat room, forum, announcement page for people to navigate around. It has a tabloid style layout equipped with headlines and sub sections to cater to the different taste of the population. E.g “Foodie section”, “IT section” and “Campus Happenings”. (STOMP, 2006)

STOMP has a high level of interactivity. It’s easy to navigate interface and strong participatory level from its audience are the key factors to its popularity. With a strong contribution from citizens whom are non-journalists, it would seem rather strange to find a proper, journalistic format. Instead, audiences can take comfort in the fact that articles or discussions in the forum are written by ordinary citizens who do not have to bear the editor’s last words in mind, and not have deadlines to meet, and also not have to consider the risking the interest of a conglomerate. Somehow, it almost always seems credible if someone were to write something without having external factors that affect the input. Everything, becomes magically, more believable.

That much said, STOMP is a good platform for budding citizen journalists. But, since it’s almost impossible to create something perfect, STOMP may not be the most ideal. The fact that we live in a non utopian world shows that the world is flawed and for almost every instance, there is room for improvement. Like STOMP, there is still a need for moderation. People get to go on rambling on some really insignificant issues. As for some really important issues, it is really difficult to deem it credible if written in a slip shod manner. It also seems almost apparent that the contributions were only made by locals. It would be fascinating if there were global contributions with a more insightful perspective.



References:

“Citizen Journalism” (March 29, 2006) From Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, Retrieved March 30, 2007, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen_journalism

Gillmor, D. “We the Media: Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People” (July, 2004). Retrieved March 30, 2007 from http://download.nowis.com/index.cfm?phile=WeTheMedia.html&tip

STOMP (2006) From Singapore Press HoldingsRetrieved March 30, 2007 from http://www.stomp.com.sg/

QOTW8: Excuse me, are u a Democrat?

The blog that I have chosen is J B Jeyaretnam’s Blog (http://blog.jbjeya.org/ ). It was managed by both Uncle Yap and J B Jeyaratnam. Jeyaretnam was an ex politician and once held many honorable titles and occupations in Singapore. The first blog entry was in September 21, 2005.

The blog consist mostly of press statements or retorts to press statements that were published in the newspapers. Comments that were made by JBJ are usually of those opposing the current government in Singapore. He has selectively chosen certain press statements and dissected them individually showing his oppression by attacking each loophole in the press releases. The retorts have sometimes not even seemed to appear diplomatic. In any case, it seems almost obvious about his dissatisfaction with the Lee family.

Quote: “THIS IS THE UNIQUELY SINGAPORE DEMOCRACY -A SHAM OF DEMOCRACY” (J B Jeyaretnam)

Apparently, J B Jeyaretnam has repeatedly disrespectfully scrutinized MM Lee’s words. In one instance, he implied that MM Lee said that the younger generation should not be intimidated by him. But, he claims that MM Lee had also once said that he wouldn’t hesitate to use his hatchet on anyone who stands in his way. J B Jeyaretnam’s almost literal depiction of this particular statement has put MM Lee in a bad light. The entries in the blog continue with numerous amounts of retorts to whatever “loopholes” he has discovered in all the various statements made by the government and the Lee family. It is by far evidently clear that he has sheer discontent for the system and its operation. (Jeyaretnam, 2007)

With the introduction of blogs, Netizens are given an alternative outlet to voice out their opinions. The conventional “Speaker’s Corner” option was deemed inefficient and there were many complications before a person could actually hold a speech. Blog’s however, gave people the freedom of voicing their political opinions without much hindrance. (Giam, 2006)

So then, we ask ourselves, to what extent do blogs allow for greater democracy in Singapore? As mentioned, blogs are a convenient avenue for people to voice their opinions. But, the blogs with negative views or responses about the government, would they be held accountable for their opinions? Mrbrown a well known political blogger, was targeted for his controversial letter he wrote to the TODAY newspaper on 30 June. It appears that though his criticisms about the government were made in a relaxed, informal manner, the MICA (Ministry of Information, Communications & the Arts) said that his comments has clearly misrepresented the truth, altering it in a way to make the substantiations for the price increases following the Elections seemingly invalid and uncalled for. MICA claimed that he wouldn’t have received such hostility if he had posted his opinions only in his blog, which they deem have a less and more limited niche audience. But then, who’s to say if he wouldn’t have receive the equal actions taken against him if he were just to publish it in his blog? Also, the numbers for people who read blogs for current events and information, especially from the younger generation, has been ever increasing since the birth of blogs. (Giam, 2006)

Though politicians and Netizens have used blogs to facilitate and propagate their messages, we will never know to what extent of “democracy” is permitted before the government decides to take action against them be it publicly or in a discreet manner.


References:

Giam, G. (2006). Review- The politics of Singapore’s new media in 2006. Retrieved Friday, March 23, 2007 from http://theonlinecitizen.com/2006/12/31/review-the-politics-of-singapores-new-media-in-2006/

Jeyaretnam, J B (2007). Fight on Singaporeans! Down the FamiLee Regime! Retrieved Friday, March 23, 2007 from http://jbjeya.org/blog///index.php?m=200509

QOTW7: What Are You Twittering About Right Now?

Virtual Communities, a term we seem to be having around so often since the information age took the world. What exactly is a virtual community? It is when a group of people interact or communicate over the Internet. It is also an alternative for people who actually know each other in real life to communicate with each other. (Wikipedia Virtual Community, 2007)

Is a virtual community really different from an actual community?

According to Rheingold, he believes that people in virtual communities interact for a myriad of reasons. They can engage in intellectual discussions, have arguments, share knowledge on various subjects, play games, conduct businesses, have idle chat, flirt etc. But, the only aspect that lacks from virtual communities is the absence of the physical characteristic in the interaction. (Fernback & Thompson, 1995)
There are limitations to a real life community that a virtual one can surpass. Although lacking the physical characteristic, the structure of virtual communities allows for communication over vast distances. It also allows for people from different times zones to interact in a asynchronous nature.(Wellman & Gulia, 1996) Though, it may be debated that the ties of members in online communities may not be as strong as those in actual communities, there are certainly advantages that can make up for it.

Existing popular online communities such as Friendster and MySpace and Hardwarezone have been a real hit with Singaporean users. According to guest speaker Ben Koe, various online communities serve different purposes. Cozycot (http://forums.cozycot.com) for example, has information and prices on all the latest cosmetic products available. It’s almost like a girl’s dream come true! Harwarezone (http//www.hardwarezone.com), which has more than 250,000 members, is a forum that allows people to discuss about tech stuff and gadgets. Members can put up reviews, and price guides to inform other members and updates of new gadgets.
Here lies the introduction of a new online community. Twitter. What is Twitter? Is it just another rip-off or spawn of the other many online communities? Well, each of these online communities are in certain ways similar, but they all have their advantages in other aspects.

So why Twitter?

Twitter is a hub that allows you to check in with your friends and updates you on what they are up to almost instantaneously. Twitter’s main interface has a theme with the heading “What are you doing?” It prompts you to type in text so that the people in your network would, well, know what you are doing! After submitting a post, it encourages you to create another post. Having use Twitter, it’s almost comparable to advertising moments of your life, of course the positive aspect to it, is that you get to choose which aspect you want revealed. Imitating the short-message-service (SMS) format, each entry allows for 140 characters chunk which would engage everyone in your community in a timely conversation. You can send notices or updates through your cell phone, IM or through the web to notify your friends and followers of the events in your day. Twitter.com isn’t just an ordinary online community; it encompasses many components and has the ability for immediate response.

References:

Fernback, J. & Thompson, B. (1995). Virtual Communities: Abort, Retry or Failure? Retrieved on March 15, 2007 from http://www.rheingold.com/texts/techpolitix/VCcivil.html


Virtual Communities. (2007). In Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved on March 15, 2007 from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Twitter&oldid=115023086

Wellman, B. & Gulia, M. (1996). Netsurfers Don't Ride Alone: Virtual Communities as Communities. Retrieved on March 15, 2007 from http://www.acm.org/%7Eccp/references/wellman/wellman.html

Stop Looking Over My Shoulder!

It’s another day in your life and there you are doing the monotonous events that occur so ever often that it has become a habit. There you are buying your usual preference of coffee choice at a Starbucks café and walking out when you suddenly receive a phone call. “Hey, how about getting me a mocha frapp!” You start to freak out. Suddenly you feel as if your friend is watching you from somewhere and even though it is someone you know, the whole notion of you thinking that you were alone has been violated. You start looking around frantically to see where your friend is and you start to get a little edgy and uncomfortable.

Now, imagine if this was happening to you everyday, all the time, where someone is watching over you. It would be like living a life Jim Carrey did in The Truman Show. The act of self-disclosure is important in people’s lives because it may help in developing relationships. However, self-disclosure is usually voluntary. Humans need boundaries. The fast paced advancement in technology however, allows room for your privacy to be invaded. Be it the activities you carry out on the computer, the various functions that your cell phone possesses that you think are inventions of pure ingenuity, are all ways in which strangers can gather information about you. (Sullivan, 2006)

So what exactly is privacy? When an individual or groups of people feel the need to keep their personal information, affairs or control the amount of information they want disclosed. Privacy may be voluntary disclosed, but though it may be beneficial at times, it could also bring about some form of detriment to the individual disclosing the information. (Wikipedia Privacy, 2007)

If we treasured our privacy, why do we still subject ourselves to vulnerable instances where our lines of boundaries are crossed? In a perfect world, a relationship of trust and emotional connection with any other individual should include reciprocal self-disclosure. (Rosen, 2004) In the Internet age, we are usually obligated to reveal information about ourselves to people whom we will never meet face to face. Usually, when we sign ourselves up or register for some service online, we are compelled to reveal personal details of ourselves before completing the registration. This information unfortunately, may not be as exclusive to that particular service as you think it is. Information given may be manipulated to a certain extent without our knowledge. Sometimes, we receive emails or messages on our cell phones by organizations with whom we are not affiliated with, but seem to know sufficient information about us to know that we fit their particular target market.

If you have ever seen an episode of the hit TV series 24, you will be appalled by what technology can do. Aside from the dramatic factors that some of the elements of the show is make believe to enhance the attraction feature of a show, there are certain aspects that are as real as can be. It is without a doubt, that the activities you indulge in everyday at work could easily be monitored. Outgoing emails could be monitored by higher management and conversations on the phones could be “tapped”. CCTV’s could also be installed in offices to “watch” over the staff. All these elements of surveillance infringe our privacy and it can be rather distressing for an employee. Though not all employees breach company policies by using company resources for personal gains, the psychological reactance that some may get from the fact that they are being “watched” all the time may be excruciatingly detrimental to an individual’s mental state.

References:

Rosen, J. (19th July, 2004). "The Naked Crowd". Retrieved on 9th March, 2007 from http://www.spiked-online.com/Printable/0000000CA5FF.htm

Sullivan, B. (17th October, 2006). "Privacy Lost: Does Anyone Care?". Retrieved on 9th March, 2007 from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15221095/print/1/displaymode/1098/

Privacy (7th March, 2007). In Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved on 9th March, 2007 from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Privacy&oldid=113354124